Farmers Almanac
The Farmers Almanac
Order your copy today!

Are You Guilty Of Using These Phrases Incorrectly?

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Subscribe by Email Print This Post
Are You Guilty Of Using These Phrases Incorrectly?

Here’s an article designed to whet your appetite—rather than wet your appetite (this is one many people get wrong! See the explanation, below).  We’re about to open a language can of worms here: Below are some common phrases that many people are using incorrectly. Are you guilty of any of these faulty phrases?

A Can of Worms?

Are you waiting with baited breath for more information? Well, it’s actually bated breath—bated being the shortened form of abated, meaning “diminished.”

All Tied Up

May the lessons here strike a responsive cord in your mind. Oops, it’s strike a responsive chord. The figurative comparison here is musical. A chord is a set of tones, a cord just a piece of string.

Easy As Pie

Read carefully, and you’ll get your just deserts, not your just desserts. Deserts, in this case, are not pie or pudding—they refer to what you justly deserve.

Are You Saying It Wrong?

Many faulty phrases involve mispronunciations that mangle the sounds of the words when we speak them:

A Biting Remark

May this small instruction manual can help nip your mistakes in the butt. Ack! Employing an agricultural metaphor, the intended statement should be to nip your mistakes in the bud before they can grow and fully flower.

Bring It On Home

Do you hone in on an issue? No, sorry, that should be home in on. To hone means “to sharpen,” as in, “to hone a knife” or “to hone a skill.” To home in on means “to move closer to a target.” Think “homing pigeon”!

A Rock and a Hard Place

For all intensive purposes you really shouldn’t take for granite any phrase, right? Actually, these pervasive expressions in their correct form are for all intents and purposes and take for granted. They make more sense that way, don’t they?

Dog Days

It’s a doggy dog world out there, so stop mispronouncing this common expression! The competitiveness of human life makes it a dog-eat-dog world.

Like a Wrecking Ball

Such boo-boos wreck havoc on your language. That version also somewhat makes sense, but the conventional form is to wreak havoc. Havoc means “chaos, “and wreak here means “to cause the infliction of.”  And it’s not “reek” either: the only creatures that can reek havoc are skunks.

Split Hairs

When words collide, some competing versions come within a hare’s breath or hare’s breadth or hair’s breath or hair’s breadth of each other. The only correct way to write and read this one is hair’s breadth, the thickness of single human hair. The expression has nothing to do with rabbits or breathing. I hope that jibes (not jives), with your understanding of the idiom.

Call & Answer

Master these distinctions, and they will serve you at your beckon call. Not quite. They will serve you at your beck and call—beck meaning “when you gesture at them,” and call meaning, “when you command them.”

All Turned Around

The last category of fractured, faulty phrases is those that lack logic. For example, I’m hoping that, as a result of my instruction, you’ll make a 360-degree turn in your verbal skills. In reality, that’s the last thing I want to happen because a 360-degree turn puts you right back where you started. I’m hoping to inspire you to make a 180-degree turn in your speaking.

Be Careful

Some folks could care less about biting their mother tongue. But if they could care less, they must care to some extent. So, don’t be careless with care less. Use couldn’t care less to indicate that you don’t care even a smidge.

Why is it “Whet” and Not “Wet”?

The spelling of the phrase above is, indeed, whet because the metaphor here compares the sharpening (whetting) of a knife to the sharpening of one’s hunger).

11 comments

1 Angie_formerly_stl { 07.01.19 at 5:22 pm }

Kat, you have to admit, if you’ve never heard of diatomaceous earth before, it’s rather hard to spell. Actually I’ve known about it for years, and I still had to copy and paste it, because I would have never been able to spell it!

Deanna,
There, their and they’re, and too, two and to are a question of grammar not spelling, as that they are homophones. I completely agree on loose and lose! They don’t even sound the same, if people are saying them properly. On ‘that’, I’m horribly guilty of overusing it!!

Charlotte and Susan,
I use ‘irregardless’ just to see if anyone will call me on it, but only on unimportant things, like Facebook.

I don’t think we are losing our language, there are just as many people using it correctly as there are that don’t. Though I may not be in the best place to judge, since “redneck” is the language I hear most often. That’s what happens in the middle of Missouri though.

2 Kat { 06.27.19 at 12:33 pm }

I believe the problem is that people arent listening or don’t quite catch what is being said. I told a friend about diatomaceous earth so she looked it up on line. Then she told me that she could not find “diatenacious” earth anywhere on the internet. When I told her about it she either was not listening as closely as she thought or she mis-heard me.
We aren’t losing our language. There will always be people who hear it wrong/say it wrong.

3 Beth Brown { 06.27.19 at 9:21 am }

The expression that irritates me is when some one says ” they were conversating with someone ” where did that come from ? The English language is indeed being lost.

4 Not So Free { 06.26.19 at 5:37 pm }

I am an old(er) fart who learned correct English a long time ago.
.
What I learned from this article is the fact that we are losing our language.

5 Susan Higgins { 06.27.19 at 9:14 am }

HI Joyce Webb, take a look here, this may answer your question! https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/83000.html

6 Joyce Webb { 06.26.19 at 12:26 pm }

I’ve always wondered about a lot of sayings, like “It’s no skin off my teeth” !!!

7 Deanna { 06.26.19 at 11:05 am }

I understand many people don’t know how to spell so I don’t find it irritating when they misuse their, there, they’re, or two, too, to, etc… But for whatever reason misusing lose and loose seems idiotic to me. They are easily understandable in their meanings. The other thing which always jumps out at me is the word “that”. It is a filler word and 99% of the time is not necessary in a sentence. An example is in the above article- the author says “Use couldn’t care less to indicate that you don’t care even a smidge.” The word “that” is not needed. The sentence stands on its own as “Use couldn’t care less to indicate you don’t care even a smidge”. I find the word irksome.

8 Susan Higgins { 06.27.19 at 9:15 am }

Charlotte, good one! Not only silly, but not even a word!

9 Charlotte { 06.26.19 at 7:56 am }

One that totally is silly is “irregardless” vs regardless

10 Linda { 06.26.19 at 7:19 am }

My pet peeve is the use of the word “gift” (and variations thereof) in place of “give”. No, you were not “gifted”…..you were GIVEN something.

11 Mary { 06.26.19 at 6:57 am }

I was corrected by an English teacher for, according to her, miss using an idiom. Turned out, I was correct. I don’t think She has forgiven me yet.

Leave a Comment

Note: Comments that further the discussion of the above content are likely to be approved. Those comments that are vague or are simply submitted in order to promote a product, service or web site, although not necessarily considered "spam," are generally not approved.

If you notice a hole in the upper left-hand corner of your Farmers' Almanac, don't return it to the store! That hole isn't a defect; it's a part of history. Starting with the first edition of the Farmers' Almanac in 1818, readers used to nail holes into the corners to hang it up in their homes, barns, and outhouses (to provide both reading material and toilet paper). In 1919, the Almanac's publishers began pre-drilling holes in the corners to make it even easier for readers to keep all of that invaluable information (and paper) handy.

Spring Is Here – Sign Up Today!

The Farmers' Almanac is a gardener's best friend. Get 365 days of access to our online weather and gardening calendars + a copy of the 2017 Almanac
for only $13.99 $11.99!

Subscribe Today »